CDHS Printable View

Venezuela's Tragedy: Lessons For America

This is the recap by Frank Robinson, of a presentation by Professor Javier Corrales, at the April 14th, 2019 CDHS monthly meeting.

            

Javier Corrales is the Dwight Morrow professor of political science at Amherst. His talk about the situation in Venezuela was divided into three parts: what he called "democratic backsliding;" economic collapse; and lessons for America.

Corrales explained that the democratic backsliding preceded and led to the economic disaster. And he saw reasons for concern that the story could repeat even in well-established democracies like ours.

Corrales started with "Democracy 101." America, in the 1700s, basically invented the modern concept of liberal democracy. (Not to be confused with the "liberalism" that's a political orientation of some Americans.) It's rooted in the Enlightenment, with government accountable to people, and limited, to prevent tyranny by either a minority or a majority. A key means is to divide power among different government branches to check each other, with constraints upon government as a whole to leash its authority.

For a time, after WWII, and especially after the Cold War, liberal democracy was spreading. But then came a "democratic recession" beginning around 2006. Notable cases are Turkey and Hungary, and of course Venezuela. What we see is not the "old fashioned" putsch, but something that more insidiously starts in ambiguity what Corrales called "executive aggrandizement," with other centers of power being neutered or co-opted. The picture may ostensibly seem at first more democratic, with a majority thinking they're getting what they voted for.

Then the regime uses and abuses laws, and creates new ones, to make an uneven political playing field. Elections are still held, but they're manipulated by a host of measures to produce the desired results. The ruling party becomes a rubber stamp cheering section. The opposition is demonized and delegitimized. Press freedom is suppressed.

Political scientists use a host of criteria to measure a nation's degree of democracy. Corrales presented a graphic timeline of Venezuela's scores. They started low, as a dictatorship until the 1950s, when they jumped to a sustained democratic plateau. Then in 1999 Hugo Chavez got elected president, and Venezuela's democratic score fell off a cliff. (Corrales also displayed Cuba's graph basically flatlined since the 1959 Castro takeover and America's, starting high and rising higher through the period, but with a noticeable drop in the last few years.)

Another set of criteria encompasses all the specific ways in which undemocratic regimes subvert fair elections, and here again a detailed chart was presented for Venezuela. At the start of the Chavez era, voting was still pretty much fair. But then the regime utilized ever more of the measures on the chart, to the point where today, Venezuela's voting is a cynical charade.

The manipulation became necessary because whereas Chavez was actually popular for a while, the regime's popularity faded, and nosedived under his successor Maduro. This leads us to the matter of the economic disaster. Venezuela is an oil state; that is, almost all its national earnings are from oil. Chavez was the beneficiary of a big spike in the global oil price, and he used the windfall to buy off political support from the poorer classes. Then the oil price collapsed with the 2008 global financial crisis. As it's been said, "when the tide goes out, you see who's swimming without a bathing suit."

In Venezuela's case, the regime's economic mismanagement became tragically evident, plunging the once-rich nation into poverty, with an inflation rate measured in millions of percent, and a tenth of the 30 million population escaping to other countries. Corrales explained that Chavez not only imprudently spent all the oil windfall (saving nothing), but went deep into debt besides. While some of this profligacy did trickle down to the poor, most was frittered away through corruption and incompetence. None was allocated to investment to build the economy.

So Venezuela suffered from an unrestrained state and that was combined with a restrained private sector. Chavez's "socialism" led the regime to regulate private business so as to destroy it. Thus food, medicine, and all sorts of other goods (which Venezuela, so oil-concentrated, used to import) have disappeared from the shelves. While the regime's fiscal indiscipline brought forth hyper-inflation. It made things worse by responding with price controls and even more punitive anti-business measures.

Corrales rejected any idea that America somehow bears responsibility for Venezuela's travail. To the contrary, he said, the U.S. actually helped finance the regime by buying its oil (now stopped).

Corrales said the world's democratic backsliding is driven by populism, defined by its perceived political betes-noires. On the left (epitomized by Venezuela) it's anti-capitalism, anti-imperialism, anti-Americanism. Bernie-style populism inveighs against corporations and the rich. Right-wing populism typically demonizes non-native people and crime. For both right and left, the stomping on hated enemies can excuse the stomping on democratic norms. (Many Western lefties still defend Maduro.)

thomas

Trump's working from this playbook is obvious: executive aggrandizement, undermining governmental checks and balances, demonizing and delegitimizing opponents and the free press. We even see election manipulation, with voter suppression. This is how it starts. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

 

Frank Robinson

 

To contact us or send website comments, please email

webmaster (at) humanistsociety (dot) org

 

Return to CDHS Home